Skip to main content

The Anatomy of Videogames: A Primer







 
Videogames are easily one of the most rapidly evolved mediums in existence—in the span of just a few decades, they have repeatedly raised and broke the bar of their own limits, in every single aspect. Innovative gameplay mechanics, engaging storylines, immersive level designs and above all, the fusion of all of these different elements into something exponentially more—an experience that moves the player from both inside and out—videogames have achieved this more than enough times already. It seems that this medium has literally become the most potent translator of human imagination, and yes, it’s more impressive than it sounds like.


So I don’t think videogames have anything more to prove—they already outdid themselves way too many times and created a niche culture that’s as unique as itself. It may sound cliché but videogames are just made of win.


But after all these decades of collective experience and gameplays, there are certain traits or characteristics that we find at the heart of any videogame, played out (yeah, pun intended) in a distinctive way. And if we take a closer look at some of those videogames that have carved their places in the hearts and minds of the players, the ones that are known as the ‘legends’ such as Halo, Half Life 2, Deus Ex (the original one), Portal 2, Mass Effect 2, Dragon Age: Origins (a personal favorite) just to name a few, we’ll find something very common to every one of them.


But first we need to know about the basic elements or ingredients that ‘form’ the experience of a videogame. Basically any videogame runs on 4 key mechanisms or design elements, and the first of them is Core Gameplay Mechanics (basically your ‘activity’ in a game, what are the things that you ‘do’ in that game, the ‘what’ aspect of a game like what’s the game all about), which is certainly the most important aspect of any videogame as this is what makes or breaks a game, even if all the other elements are overlooked.


Then there’s Level Design, the second pillar as I’d like to call it. This is what ‘builds’ the game in the first place and is as fundamental of an element as gameplay. Level Design is the ‘where’ part of any videogame, what you look at in the game and what you see (the ‘doing’ or action comes after that, naturally, it’s all based on what you see).


This is also the single most important aspect of any first person shooter as most of our time is spent on, guess what, looking. And Level Design is, what we ‘look at’ in a game. Actually ‘looking’ is as crucial in an fps (or in any genre) as the ‘doing’ or ‘gameplay’ part cause one is very much dependent on the other.


After that, there is the Narrative or the Storytelling part. This is not the same as the plot or the story of a videogame, the plot is actually a part of the storytelling. Storytelling not only consists of the main plot, but also of how the story is ‘told’ or presented to the player, the techniques used (in-game cutscenes or just scripted events, or any other innovative ways possible) and how the story ‘moves’ with respect to the player. I’d like to call storytelling the ‘why’ aspect of a game, the element that gives motivation to the player to continue with the game, ‘why’ are they interested in the game so to speak.


This element forms the ‘intrigue’ part of the videogame and has the potential to engage the player in emotional ways in the game world, giving a reason to ‘care’, for the events in the game.


Now in any videogame, we find a fusion of these three elements in a way that basically ‘blurs’ all of these different mechanisms into a singular experience. And at any point in the game, it feels like there’s only ‘one’ element present, the game itself. We don’t recognize (most of the time) that these three elements are working in such perfect synergy that there is no separation to them at all, the line is hidden and what we remember from the game, is the experience itself, as a whole. This is the ‘immersion’ aspect of a game, how well the game ‘handles’ it’s ‘parts’ and weaves them into a mix.


Now in cases of all great videogames, the ‘whole’ of the experience seems much more than the ‘sum of it’s parts’ or it seems there’s an added ‘unseen’ element that’s present and that’s responsible for adding something in the game that’s beyond all of these three individual elements.


It’s difficult to actually come up with a ‘name’ or ‘pointer’ (every word is only a pointer) for that ‘fourth’, unseen element. But it’s real and it’s what separates the great from the good. Personally, I’d like to call it ‘inspiration’, something that comes from the developers themselves and transmits itself into their work, which is the videogame in this case. How ‘inspired’ the ideas are (gameplay ideas, the level design and the story-based ideas), how fresh or attractive they are and how they are implemented within the game—all of these make up that fourth unseen element. Basically, this is the ‘how’ aspect of games. Every game has the three elements but ‘how’ they use them decides their lasting value—the reason we remember a game long after we’ve played it.


Now there’s another kind of ‘sub-element’ in a game which is more like a function of the key design elements but it’s worth mentioning simply cause it makes a difference. And it’s called the ‘Replayability’ factor—how many times can you play the game without feeling bored or feeling redundant.


It depends mostly on the gameplay itself, how much depth there is to it or how many different experiences can it present to the player, if played in different ways. Or for games that feature multiple story branches which give the player a purpose for replaying the game to experience those parts of the story, it’s the narrative that creates the replay value.


Then there are games such as the Dishonored series (just to name one, there are plenty of them) which gives the player many different ways to approach an objective through their open-ended and multi faceted level design, adding to the overall replayability of the game.


So the replayability factor is actually a function of the individual key design elements in a videogame—gameplay mechanics, level design or the non-linear storytelling—they can all contribute towards achieving this, providing gamers a purpose for revisiting the game.


These are what I consider the key design elements that make up a videogame, or the experience of a videogame. In the next article (which'll be here when it’s done), we’ll go deeper into videogames, beyond the technical aspects and focus on the very DNA of a great game—what it stands for, the experience it aims for and it’s purpose for being the way it is.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dragon Age 2 guide: Bloodlusted Forcemage

The mage has always been the most powerful class in the dragon age games----dealing devastating area of effect (AOE) spells & single target damages enough to obliterate anyone dare to cross his path...until they start paying attention to him. As soon as his enemies get to him, he's dead meat. The mage is as powerful as he/she is squishy. But all that changes with the Bloodlusted Forcemage (BF mage). Remember the mage from the opening sequence after choosing the class in DA2? The BFmage is similar to that in terms of both raw power & defense. The BFmage do not hide & do not run away at the first sign of threat and can easily go toe-toe toe with his foes alongside the warrior or tanks. It was my second playthrough as a mage when I found this build after much experimenting with the class. And yes, the Bloodlusted Forcemage completely obliterates The Arishok in Nightmare with ease & that's when I know this build really works. Vulgar display of Pow

Dragon Age 2 guide----The Shadowy Assassin

"It's a ghost, it's a one hit killer, oh no it's the Shadowy Assassin"----Lieutenant That's actually the most apt description I've found for this unbelievably powerful build, believe it or not. The Shadowy Assassin (SA) is simply an unstoppable force of nature. He moves so fast that enemies have a hard time trying to get a bead on him, annihilates weaker foes with one shot (not talking about spike damage)----even after some archers actually manage to focus on him, all they can manage to hit is a rigged decoy ready to blow into smithereens. Meanwhile the SA makes short work of them from behind, and when that Lieutenant is the only one left standing, something beautiful happens----the mage puts a winter's grasp/cone of cold on him, the SA throws something at the Lieutenant & when he thinks he's got it figured, only the cracking sound of bones getting crunched is heard----poetry in motion. The fight is over before it ever had a ch

The Best Live version of Comfortably Numb

Pink Floyd’s Comfortably Numb is undoubtedly one of the greatest pieces of music ever composed on the electric guitar. And if you’ve heard the studio version, it’s literally impossible to not get blown away by the myriads of live versions of the solo that Gilmour has played through the years (or decades). And the great thing about the live renditions is that each of them brings a distinctly characteristic feel to the solo--making all of them memorable and stand on their own, it’s almost like different takes on the original studio version. For example, the Delicate Sound of Thunder version has a darker and more tormented feel overall, there are parts of the solo where it’s unlike anything ever heard from Gilmour. This version is also the most ‘badass’ and raw version of the Comfortably Numb solo, which was how Gilmour played it during the Momentary Lapse tour in the late 80’s. And until Live in Gdansk came out, this was my favorite version of the solo. Also, Gilmour’s gu